You apologised. You corrected what happened. You changed the process.
The other person is still cautious. A part of you wants to ask when the repair will finally count.
A corrected process may be visible tomorrow. Trust is carried by someone who lived with the harm. Their sense of safety does not follow your project timeline.
It is possible to seek forgiveness because you regret what happened. It is also possible to seek it because you want relief from being the person who caused it. The two can be hard to separate.
Stay with the question.
Make the repair specific. Name the harm without bargaining over its size. Keep the correction in place even when nobody praises it. Listen to the boundary the other person sets.
You can offer evidence of change. You cannot invoice someone for trust.
The Bhagavad Gita’s attention to action without possession of its results can sharpen accountability here. You still have to act, repair and accept consequences. You cannot claim authority over another person’s forgiveness.